Jean Mcguire, A Land Salesperson For The Company Sunrise...

Jean McGuire works as a land salesperson for the company Sunrise Land Developers. Six months into the job, Jean has lost more than made sales for the company and is thinking about using the sales technique described by her boss. Other sales representative’s use it and have proven to be a success, however, it involves deceiving clients by giving misleading information, which Jean instinctively objects to. The technique is to make the interested client think that someone else is also interested in buying the same property, thus encouraged to buy before someone else does. Jean objects to this use of psychological manipulation; however she does not express her reservations to anyone for fear of endangering her job. The situation is more serious for Jean as she is also a single mother with two daughters to support, so it’s imperative that Jean provides the financial support they need. An ethical dilemma does exist in Jean’s situation with respect to the choices she fa ces; use the technique and improve her sales, remain loyal to the sales team and company or voice her objections and risk losing her job as well as much needed financial support for her family. This essay first discusses how Jean’s situation constitutes an ethical dilemma, followed by comparative analysis drawn from consequential perspectives of egoism and utilitarianism about the situation, then finally possible suggestions, based on my learning, that could help Jean in her decision making. The term ethical dilemmaShow MoreRelatedEthical Dilemmas : What Should Jean Do? Essay1551 Words   |  7 PagesEthical Dilemmas: What should Jean do? Jean McGuire works as a salesperson of land property in Sunrise Land Developers. Jean’s superior Wright Boazman, the sales director, described the importance and efficiency of using â€Å"deal-closing techniques†. This technique is usually used to motivate the prospect into buying the lot, because often people really want to buy a lot but hesitate at the last few minutes of signing agreements. Wright introduced the most effective closing technology termed â€Å"the otherRead MoreLegal And Social Environment Of Business Essay1240 Words   |  5 Pages Jean McGuire works as a land salesperson for a real estate company called Sunrise Land Developers who specialise in selling lots to prospective clients. Her clients require her to represent the lots in an accurate light. The company’s sales director Wright Boazman demonstrated effective sale closing techniques to McGuire when she first began at the company however these techniques where based on physiological manipulation putting them into a now or never situation. Jean felt uneasy about

Legal Defenses Checkpoint Free Essays

Legal Defenses Checkpoint Elizabeth Stebbins 220 March 1, 2013 David McNees Legal Defenses Checkpoint Three legal defenses that could be used in court to excuse behavior are insanity, self-defense, and entrapment. Insanity is when the defendant did not know what he or she was doing at the time of the crime, or did not know that it was wrong. It is when the individual is not in their right mind because of mental illness or such. We will write a custom essay sample on Legal Defenses Checkpoint or any similar topic only for you Order Now Usually they are sent to psychiatric facilities for treatment and if treated, they are transferred to prisons to complete their terms. Self-defense is when the victim of a potentially deadly attack kills another because it is the only reasonable thing to do to protect them from bodily harm and they are unable to get away. Those who use the self-defense plea are saying that they acted appropriately for the situation and not doing so would have resulted in their own death or serious injury. Entrapment is a situation in which the government takes actions that lead to or ‘create an opportunity’ for crime to happen† (Meyer Grant, 2003, p. 41). For example, a government agent convincing someone to commit a crime, who would otherwise not commit a crime. Entrapment is rarely a successful defense and not valid unless it was a government agent persuading or planting the idea in an individual. Meyer Grant (2003) state that, â€Å"to be a crime, an act requires three import ant elements: actus reus, mens rea, and concordance between the two† (p. 8). The act must be a guilty act or omission (actus reus), meaning voluntary and breaking an existing criminal statute, and have a guilty state of mind (mens rea). However, there is an exception, say when one is convicted of a crime like vehicular homicides with no intend to harm anyone. References Meyer, J. Grant, D. (2003). The Courts in our Criminal Justice System. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. How to cite Legal Defenses Checkpoint, Essay examples

Mahatma Gandhi free essay sample

Mahatma Gandhi was an amazing and hugely influential figure in history. He is renowned for his beliefs and teachings in regards to civil rights, religion, education, non-violence, and the list goes on. In this analysis I will attempt to relate Gandhi’s principles to my own, grounded in the faith and teachings of Jesus Christ. In doing so I will discuss three over-arching topics specifically: social issues, money/career, and the nature of God. A huge topic that must be continually dealt with in our world is the topic of social issues, and within that category I believe education is one of, if not the single most important. Gandhi had some very specific views on education. It was his belief that all people, regardless of circumstances or social standing, had a right to basic education. The term for the education system Gandhi promoted is Nai Talim – which translates to â€Å"basic education for all†. We will write a custom essay sample on Mahatma Gandhi or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Deeper than simply advocating education for all however, Gandhi proposed a total overhaul of the education system, in direct contrast to the British Imperialistic system that was in place at the time in that area of the world. Gandhi’s focus was on teaching practical and basic skills which could be useful at the community and village level. This is where I somewhat disagree with Gandhi’s view. I certainly see the historical reasoning for Gandhi to propose this kind of system in India; however I believe that in our world today his system is not superior to the development of highly specialized skills, beyond basic and practical skills. That small disagreement aside, Gandhi’s overall view on education does mirror my own. Education is a basic human right, and everyone should be granted this right. I believe that today more specialized education is needed than Gandhi advocated for, but our principles are completely aligned, and Gandhi’s over-arching ideas on education as a social issue can and should still be held today. As Damm (2005) states, â€Å"The end of all education should surely be service, and if a student gets an opportunity of rendering service †¦ he should consider it as a rare opportunity and treat it not as a suspension of his education but rather its complement.† (p.8) Branching out from education and social issues, the next important topic to consider in studying the life and works of Gandhi is his views on a career. In the western world we live in today the goal is simple, money. Everything comes down to money. In a western, capitalist civilization money is the key to happiness. To have a comfortable living, you must be educated and obtain a great job, along with a great salary, in order to fund a happy lifestyle. This is the reality of our world today. Based on Gandhi’s teaching and writings, he was in staunch opposition to this way of thinking. Gandhi, in his preaching, never spoke of how to better yourself or your own situation, but instead spoke of how to better others and help them. Dear (2005) quotes Gandhi, â€Å"If we would listen to the voice of God, I assure you we would hear God say that we are taking God’s name in vain if we do not think of the poor and help them†¦Try to identify yourself with the poor by actually helping them.† (p. 335) In examining the words of Gandhi, exemplified by the quote above, his thoughts on money and a career become clear. His total and complete focus on others, with complete and total disregard for himself and his own happiness and comfort in life, is nothing short of Jesus-like. Like Christ, Gandhi sought no reward for helping others. He looked for no personal gratification for his efforts, thus shunning the westernized â€Å"me-first† view that is the norm of our society today. On this, at least in theory if not in complete practice, Gandhi and I are in total agreement. My goal in my future career as a teacher is to help people. I want to educate. I am not looking to become overly wealthy; instead I am looking only to obtain my happiness through helping others. While not going to the extremes that Gandhi did, seeing as I do seek a paycheck for my services, I do still believe I can model myself after his teachings and beliefs on money and a career. Like him I aim to help others, not to just seek the best opportunity for myself to gain riches and wealth. Gandhi was not a Christian, but a practicing Hindu; however Gandhi surprisingly had a very Christian-like view on the nature of God. Certainly there are tenants of Hinduism that I, as a Christian, do not accept; but Gandhi through his life, works, and writings comes across to me as a great Christian teacher, regardless of his stated religion. Gandhi even addressed Christians directly at times. Dear (2005) again quotes Gandhi, â€Å"I suggest that all Christians must begin to live more like Jesus Christ† (p. 335) I have already outlined how Gandhi was Christ-like in his own actions, and also how he exemplified the Christian ideal of selflessness. Non-violence was also a major tenant of Gandhi’s teachings, much the same as it is a major tenant in Christianity through the teachings of Jesus. Following strictly to the teachings of Christ in the bible, Gandhi’s was a proponent of strict non-violence, not matter the situation. Howard (2011) writes, â€Å"Johnson recapitulates Gandhi’s thought that ‘counter-terrorism stimulates terrorism . . . each side justifying their violence as a necessary response to the terrorism of the other side’ (p. 109). He emphasizes the need to explore alternative approaches to confront violence and insecurity in the twenty-first century.† (p. 234) Here, I must disagree with Gandhi’s view. This quote shows that, just like Jesus, Gandhi was in favor of a strict non-violence policy. In today’s world, I just cannot agree with that. While non-violence is a great philosophy, and one I do agree with in the majority of situations, I do believe that in certain situations violence is necessary. Cases of terrorism are a perfect example. While Gandhi encourages seeking of a different solution than retaliatory violence, I see it differently. Regardless of the justification from each side, a terrorist attack on innocent and defenseless people, like that of Sept. 11, 2001 in New York, are a situation where non-violence as a practice must be set aside. Violence may beget more violence in the short run; however sitting idle will accomplish nothing at all in those types of situations. Non-violence is a great philosophy, one that I as a Christian support whole-heartedly, but my view is that exceptions must be made to every rule when the circumstances are extreme enough. While not being a Christian himself, Gandhi’s ideals and principle strongly coincide with those of Jesus. Christians today can learn a lot from the philosophy and teachings of Gandhi, and proudly take him as a role model. As a Christian, I have done exactly that through my research for this assignment. Gandhi’s views have only served to reinforce my faith in the teachings of Christ. I can firmly and whole-heartedly recommend that other Christians take on this great man as a role model and example of the Christian way of life, just as I have now done. References Damm, A. Mahatma Gandhi and Character Education in Non-Violence: Its Relevance in Religious Studies Today. Teaching Theology Religion (2011) 14.1. 3-12. Dear, J. Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolence Leader. Cistercian Studies Quarterly. (2005) 40.3. 333- 336. Howard, V.R. The philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi for the twenty-first century. Philosophies East West. (2011) 61.1. 231-236. Mahatma Gandhi free essay sample Mahatma Gandhi who was the leader of India independence movement was the hero of Indian. Gandhi studied his university in England and continued his entire life in South Africa as well as India. Thus, Gandhi had both independent self and interdependent self because Europe and Africa has totally different cultures which are individualist cultures and collectivist cultures. (Chaudaha, K. , 2010) Independent self is a way to convey and express the self is unique as well as is autonomous and separate from the group. Internal attributes such as ability, goal, personality and so on is focused on. On the other hand, interdependent self is a way of sharing things and minds with others as well as read others’ mind. The participants are sympathetic, morally, socially and others. (Chandra, B. , 1989) Mahatma Gandhi is a respectful hero in man’s heart as he got independence for India through peaceful, non-violence and truth. (Rao, M. S. , 2013) Firstly, Gandhi wanted to perish the fight between Hinduism and Islam so he had to tour around the whole India to give a speech and fast. Although he was old at that time, he still adjusted the fight between two religious. In 1947, India became the nation of Hinduism and Pakistan became the nation of Islam under Gandhi’s adjustment. Besides, Gandhi was the leader of non-cooperation movement. In 1930, British enacted a new law and enhance the tax as well as price of the salt. Thus Gandhi started make salt by himself although he knew it is illegal. After 3 weeks, thousands of Indians joined his march and in the end Gandhi was caught and in prison. Although Gandhi had been caught at that time, this campaign was the most successful to make British upset while holding on India. Thus, Gandhi’s action and goal demonstrated his independent self. During the Satyagraha movement, Gandhi talked a speech about if possible, British police could go into Indian house to check their identification stuff. Most of the Indian was angry at him but they didn’t know the actual truth was Gandhi wanted Indians to stand up together and struggled against the British. He needed all Indians’ cooperation to proceed a peaceful, non-violence and non-cooperation movement. Furthermore, in the movement, Gandhi and Indians had 2 missions which are â€Å"non-violence resistance† and â€Å"non-cooperation with the British†. (Gandhi, 1982) Most of the Indians struck and followed Gandhi’s movement. The movement’s rules were not to buy British stuff, not to accept British government position, not to accept British education system, not to attend British meeting and others. Non-cooperation movement was the first attempt at all Indians as well as whole country struggle against the British. Gandhi said that without interrelation with society, he couldn’t realize his oneness with the universe. (Copland, I. , 2001) In my opinion, independent self and interdependent self can be coexistence. Although independent self and interdependent self are totally different in their meaning, they are coexistence due to the cultural value. Cultural value can be coexistence and characterized. (Raeff, C. , 2005) For example, if there has two American, one is South American and the other one is Africa American, their cultural heritage might be still let us to find the collectivist goals. Bicultural can also coexistence the independent self and interdependent self. For instance, Gandhi had experienced two kinds of cultural which is individualist and collectivist cultures. Besides, Gandhi also had both intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligence as he had good understanding of himself and also others. Thus, independent self and interdependent self can be coexistence.